Print

Print


"Donald J. HARLOW" wrote:
 
> Charles argues that, IHHO, the morphology and syntax of
 
Does not. Quit your misrepresenting.
 
> This is a significant
> improvement over his argument of a week ago, that Esperanto was
 
Sez you, from on high.
 
> Those interested in the sources of the Esperanto vocabulary might
> consider investing in Dr. Ebbe Vilborg's "Etimologia Vortaro", which
> has so far reached four volumes and the letter 'R'.
 
A sure-fire page-turner of a best-seller!
 
> Interestingly, as a couple of us pointed out a year or so ago, we
> found Italian to be as easy (or as difficult) to read at first sight as
> either Interlingua or Occidental. One wonders why.
 
Why you said such a stupid thing?