"Donald J. HARLOW" wrote: > Charles argues that, IHHO, the morphology and syntax of Does not. Quit your misrepresenting. > This is a significant > improvement over his argument of a week ago, that Esperanto was Sez you, from on high. > Those interested in the sources of the Esperanto vocabulary might > consider investing in Dr. Ebbe Vilborg's "Etimologia Vortaro", which > has so far reached four volumes and the letter 'R'. A sure-fire page-turner of a best-seller! > Interestingly, as a couple of us pointed out a year or so ago, we > found Italian to be as easy (or as difficult) to read at first sight as > either Interlingua or Occidental. One wonders why. Why you said such a stupid thing?